[DOWNLOAD] "State Missouri v. Dee Mitchell Smith" by Supreme Court of Missouri Division 2 " eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: State Missouri v. Dee Mitchell Smith
- Author : Supreme Court of Missouri Division 2
- Release Date : January 11, 1967
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 62 KB
Description
An information filed in the Circuit Court of Macon County on December 13, 1965, charged defendant, Dee Mitchell Smith with statutory rape. Section 559.260, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. On February 16, 1966, defendant appeared with his attorney, Charles A. Powell, Jr., entered a plea of guilty to the charge, was sentenced to imprisonment for two years, applied for and was denied parole, and then sought to withdraw the plea of guilty. In State v. Williams, Mo. Sup., 361 S.W.2d 772, at 775, this Court stated: ""We have said: 'The guiding rules are that a plea of guilty is but a confession in open court. Like a confession out of court it should be received with caution. It should never be received unless it is freely and voluntarily made. It the defendant should be misled or be induced to plead guilty by fraud or mistake, by misapprehension, fear, persuasion, or the holding out of hopes which prove to be false or ill founded, he should be permitted to withdraw his plea. The law favors a trial on its merits.' State v. Cochran, 332 Mo. 742, 60 S.W.2d 1, 2; see also State v. Hare, 331 Mo. 707, 56 S.W.2d 141; State v. Harris, 336 Mo. 737, 81 S.W.2d 319; State v. Hovis, 353 Mo. 602, 183 S.W.2d 147; State v. Blatherwick, 238 Mo. App. 1005, 191 S.W.2d 1021. A leading Missouri case is State v. Stephens, 71 Mo. 535, 536, in which it is said: 'Courts have always been accustomed to exercise a great degree of care in receiving pleas of guilty, in prosecutions for felonies, to see that the prisoner has not made his plea by being misled, or under misapprehension or the like.' Thereafter in State v. Dale, 282 Mo. 663, 669, 222 S.W. 763, 764, this Court said: 'It is immaterial whether the misleading was intentionally or unintentionally done. The material inquiry is: Was the defendant misled, or under a misapprehension, at the time he entered his plea of guilty?""
![](http://pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https://mnqkyihddu.blogspot.com/2021/01/download-state-missouri-v-dee-mitchell.html&media=https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Publication/v4/f1/07/1e/f1071e26-b041-e320-8dba-a395840eeabf/source/700x700bb.jpg&description=[DOWNLOAD] "State Missouri v. Dee Mitchell Smith" by Supreme Court of Missouri Division 2 " eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free){kind=link}